Abstract
Biological control is a technique of integrated pest management where by parasites, pathogens and or predators are used to control pest species. In addition, bio-pesticides, chemicals derived from plant extracts, are also used to increase the effectiveness of bio-control technique. Pests have a potential to affect economically important crops, Brassica oleracea is an example of such crop which is affected by cabbage aphid, Brassic brevicoryne. In the current study, an evaluation of the efficiency of syrphid fly larvae and khakibos extract is tested against the cabbage aphid. A total of 28 plants were exposed to 30 aphids each. Following aphid exposure, the plants were divided into four treatment groups; control (no treatment), natural enemy, plant extract, and water treated plants. Aphids were counted on each plant 13 days after the application of the treatment. The whole experiment was laboratory based. It was found that all treatments were non-significant under Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk statistics. Control plants showed the highest number of insects, whereas those exposed to natural enemy showed least number of aphids. Our results support our null hypothesis. Tagetes minuta and syrphid larvae are effective biological control variables against aphids.
Introduction
Integrated Pest Management (IPM) is considered to be the paradigm technique to control insect pests, plant diseases, weeds and vertebrate pests (Kogan & Bajwa 1999). Different techniques and methodology are used by IPM, biological control being one of them. Biological control is defined as the action of parasites, predators, or pathogens in maintaining another organisms’ (the pest) population density at a lower average than would occur in their absence (DeBach 1964). Flint and Dreistadt (1998) describe biological control as a bio-effector method used to control pests on crops by involving an active human management role. The general principles of biological control include identifying potential biological agents, source for natural enemy, understanding their biology and their ecological services within pest-host ecosystems (Ye et.al 2013). Additionally, to increase the effectiveness of biological control, management procedures make use of botanical insecticides, chemicals based on plant extracts (Ye et.al 2013).
Aphids are known to be serious pest species in certain areas. In this study we look at the cabbage aphid, Brevicoryne brassicae Linnaneus (Aphididae). It is a species that originates from Europe, however now has a worldwide distribution (Kessing and Mau 1991). Cabbage aphid is an external pest on the leaves and flower stems of Brassica crops (Kessing and Mau 1991). The aphid feeds on phloem sap (Goggin 2007). One individual alone would not cause much damage to a whole plant; the damage is in the work-force of the whole population which leads to unsuitable crops. The rapid increase in population density of these aphids is a result of the short generation time and extremely high asexual fecundity (Kusnierczyk et.al 2008). However, there are means to control aphids. The host plant used in this study was Brassica oleracea Linnaneus (Brassicacea), a species of plant that includes food such as cultivars, including cabbage (Snogerup et.al 1990). Removal of sap of the plant by aphids weakens it and may sometimes lead to death (Ellis et.al 1998).
In the current study, extract was obtained from khakibos ,Tagetes minuta ,Linnaneus (Asteraceae) plants. T.minuta is a plant species that originates from South America and has been naturalized in South Africa (Holm et.al 1991). The strong-smelling essential oils of T. minuta have enabled it to be used for many purposes, including as a relish, laxative, diuretic, flavouring, insect repellent, stimulant and snuff (Holm et.al 1997). It widely known to have pesticidal properties due to the numerous secondary compounds it possesses (Soule 1993). The value extract is obtained from the plant through grinding, mixing with water and soap. The method is affordable to even small-scale farmers, and in addition relatively safe to both man and environment unlike most other pesticides.
Bio-control also makes use of natural enemies of targeted pests. Hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) larvae are common predators of aphid in Brassica crops (Bugg et.al 2008), and on this basis, we selected syrphid fly larvae as a natural enemy. The adult hoverflies feed on pollen and nectar and are known to be efficient pollinators. The larval life stage is when they eat aphids, usually they feed at night, sucking larger aphids empty or eating smaller aphid’s whole (Bugg et.al 2008).
The objective of the current study was to evaluate the insecticidal effectiveness of crude extracts of T. minuta L. (Asteraceae) as well as that of syrphid fly larvae against cabbage aphids, B. brassicae. Our null hypothesis was that the extract and natural enemy exposed plants will have fewer aphids than that of control and water. Our alternative hypothesis was that there will be no significant difference between the numbers of aphids seen across all treatments.
Methods and Materials
Study site and species
The study was conducted at the University of Pretoria, Department of Zoology and Entomology laboratory 3-1 (25.7536° S, 28.2297° E). The study was conducted for a period of two weeks (from 3rd October 2014 to 17th October).
The target pest species, B. brassicae L. was obtained from the botanical gardens of University of Pretoria and from Pretoria North. The host plants (B.oleracea) were grown in a controlled laboratory environment a few weeks before the experiment took place. Seedlings (± 8) were planted and covered with potting soil. The plants were grown to stage 13-14 (three to seven leaves unfolded) according to BBCH scale. Syrphid fly larvae were used as the natural enemy defence against the aphids.
Preparing the extract
Leaves (100g) from T. minuta were grinded into paste and mixed with one litre of water in a beaker. The beaker was then covered and kept at room temperature for 24hours. The mixture was then stirred and strained, followed by addition of few drops of soap (Teepol dishwashing liquid, AcornGroup).
Experimental design and treatments
A total of 28 plants were used in this experiment. Each plant was exposed to 30 aphids. Of the total, seven were treated with extract, another was treated with water, six were exposed to natural enemy (two larvae per plant), and seven were used as controls (just aphids only). In each treatment, the plant was sprayed twice (from upper angle and lower angle).
Completely randomized design was used to arrange the replicates of each treatment. Each replicate of each treatment was assigned a random number between one and seven. The treatments were then placed in a laboratory at temperature of 24ºC, natural humidity and photoperiod. After a period of 13 days, the aphids were counted on each plant.
Data analysis
Data was recorded using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Office 2010). Using IBM SPSS (Statistica 12), box-whisker plots were constructed to check for outliers. In addition, Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk statistics was used to analyse normality of data. The test for normality revealed significance for control treatment, therefore the data was log-transformed for mean of number of aphids after treatment. One-Way ANOVA and Post-Hoc LSD-multiple comparisons test were both ran to test for homogeneity of variances and test for multiple comparisons between treatments, respectively.
Results
All treatments were non-significant under Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk statistics (P>0.05) (Appendix Table 1). Test of homogeneity of variances under One-Way ANOVA revealed no significance between treatments (Levene Statistics, F3, 23 =1.899, P> 0.05). However, ANOVA test revealed that there was a significance difference between the treatments (ANOVA, F3, 23= 7.353, P<0.05). Multiple comparisons of transformed data revealed that there was a significant difference between the effectiveness of (1) control and natural enemy, (2) natural enemy and water, and (3) natural enemy and extract (Appendix Table 2). Using the data before transformation, we found that plants which were under no treatment (control) showed the highest number of aphids, followed by water and extract (Fig 1). Plants that were exposed to natural enemy showed the least number of aphids post-treatment.
|
Discussion
If the use of khakibos extract and presence of syrphid fly larvae enhances bio-control of cabbage aphid, then fewer aphids should be observed on the plants exposed to the natural enemy, and those that were treated with the extract, as compared to the control. The study did in fact find that plants exposed to natural enemy showed less number of aphids, and those treated with the extract. Our results indicate that syrphid fly larva is an effective natural enemy of cabbage aphid. Mahr et.al (1993) also found that syrphid fly larvae are effective predators in destroying cabbage aphids, especially small colonies. Furthermore, the colonies are usually favoured by humid weather, of which is unfavourable to aphids (Mahr et.al 1993).
Our results also indicate that the plant extract mixture from Tagets minuta is an effective bio-pesticide of cabbage aphids. Furthermore, T.minuta extracts have also been shown to significantly kill other insects such as beetles (Weaver et.al 1994), mosquitoes (Philogene et.al 1985) and armyworms (Rao et.al 2000). These studies have identified plant essential oils as the active ingredient that acts to kill larvae or prevent successful pupation from taking place (Dunkel et.al 2010). Extracts of these plants have also shown to repel these pests (USEPA 2012) giving it potential to be implemented in intercropping systems (Phoofolo et.al 2013).
The original aphids that were exposed to plants were just chosen randomly without taking into account the age structure or sex ratio. This might have affected the general population growth on plants that had fewer females. In addition, counting the aphid’s post-treatment, human error was eliminated by having two individuals count separately and taking the average of the two counts.
The objective of the current study was to evaluate the insecticidal effectiveness of crude extracts of T. minuta L. (Asteraceae) as well as that of syrphid fly larvae against cabbage aphids, B. brassicae. Our null hypothesis was that the extract and natural enemy exposed plants will have fewer aphids than that of control and water, and this was supported by the result of the study. The use of Tagetes minuta and syrphid fly larva should be well communicated to farmers, both small and large scale, to increase crop production that would be market suitable. Perhaps application of this extract can also be tested in other pests attacking Brassica crops and related species.
References
DeBach, P. 1964. The scope of biological control. p. 3-20. In Biological Control of Insect Pests and Weeds. Chapman and Hall Ltd., London. 844 pp
Dunkel, F.V., Jaronski, S.T., Sedlak, C.W., Meiler, S.U., Veo, K.D. 2010. Effects of steam-distilled shoot extract of Tagetes minuta (Asterales: Asteraceae) and Entomopathogeneic fungi on larval Tetanops myopaeformis. Environmental Entomology 39: 979-988
Ellis, P.R., Pink, D.A.C., Phelps, K., Jukes, P.L., Breeds, S.E., Pinnegar, A.E. 1998. Evaluation of a core collection of Brassica oleracea accessions for resistance to Brevicoryne brassicae, the cabbage aphid. Euphtica 103: 149-160
Ellis, S., Croxall, J. P., Cooper, J. 1998. Penguin conservation assessment and management plan: report from the workshop held 8-9 September 1996, Cape Town, South Africa. IUCN/SSC, Apple Valley, USA.
Flint, M.L. &Dreistadt, S.H. 1998.Natural enemies handbook: The illustrated guide to biological pest control. University of California.
Goggin, F.L. 2007. Plant-aphid interactions: molecular and ecological perspectives. Current Opinion Plant Biology 10(4): 399-408
Kessing JLM, Mau RFL. 1991. Cabbage aphid, Brevicoryne brassicae (Linnaeus). Crop Knowledge Master. Department of Entomology, Honolulu, Hawaii.
Kogan, M. and W. I. Bajwa. 1999. Integrated Pest Management: A global reality? An. Soc. Entomol. Brasil. 28:1-25.
Kusnierczyk, A., Winge, P.J.,, Stokmo, T.,Troczynska, J., Rossiter, J.T; Bones, A. 2008. Towards global understanding of plant defence against aphids – timing and dynamics of early Arabidopsis defence responses to cabbage aphid (Brevicoryne brassicae) attack. Plant, Cell and Environment. 31 (8).
Mahr, S., D. Mahr and J. Wyman. 1993. Biological control of insect pests of cabbage and other crucifers. N. Cent. Reg. Pub. 471; 54 pp.
Philogene, B.J.R., Arnason, J.T., Berg, C.W., Duval, F., Morand, P. 1985. Efficacy of the plant photoxin alphaterthienyl against Aedes intrudens and effects of nontarget organisms. Journal of Chemical Ecology 12: 893-898
Phoofolo, M.W., Mabaleha, S., Mekbib, S.B. 2013. Laboratory assessment of insecticidal properties of Tagetes minuta crude extracts against Brevicoryne brassicae on cabbage. Journal of Entomology and Nematology 5(6): 70-76
Rao, M.S., Pratibha, G., Korwar, G.R. 2000. Evaluation of aromatic oils against Helicoverpa armigera. Annual Plant Protection Sciences 8: 236-238
USEPA (United State Environmental Protection Agency). 2012. Biopesticides Registration Action Document- Tagetes Oil- PC Code: 176602. Accessed [http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/chem_search/reg_actions/registration/decision_PC-176602_22-Mar-12.pdf]
Weaver, D.K., Wells, C.D., Dunkel, F.V., Bertsch, W., Sing, S.E., Sriharan, S. 1994. Insecticidal activity of floral, foliar, and root extracts of Tagetes minuta (Asterales: Asteraceae) against adult Mexican bean weevils (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Stored Product Entomology 90: 1678-1683
Ye, G.Y.,Xiao, Q., Chen, M., Chen, X., Yuan, Z., Stanley, D.W. & Hu, C. 2013.Tea: Biological control of insect and mite pests in China. Biological Control 9:14-21.
Appendix
Treat | Kolmogorov-Smirnova | Shapiro-Wilk | |||||
Statistic | df | Sig. | Statistic | df | Sig. | ||
LogAphATMean | Control | .280 | 7 | .104 | .914 | 7 | .427 |
NE | .223 | 6 | .200* | .847 | 6 | .148 | |
Extract | .186 | 7 | .200* | .906 | 7 | .371 | |
Water | .204 | 7 | .200* | .886 | 7 | .256 |
(I) Treat | Mean Difference (I-J) | Std. Error | Sig. | 95% Confidence Interval | ||
Lower Bound | Upper Bound | |||||
Control | NE | 1.30482* | .31377 | .000 | .6557 | 1.9539 |
Extract | .45702 | .30146 | .143 | -.1666 | 1.0806 | |
Water | .02820 | .30146 | .926 | -.5954 | .6518 | |
NE | Control | -1.30482* | .31377 | .000 | -1.9539 | -.6557 |
Extract | -.84780* | .31377 | .013 | -1.4969 | -.1987 | |
Water | -1.27661* | .31377 | .000 | -1.9257 | -.6275 | |
Extract | Control | -.45702 | .30146 | .143 | -1.0806 | .1666 |
NE | .84780* | .31377 | .013 | .1987 | 1.4969 | |
Water | -.42881 | .30146 | .168 | -1.0524 | .1948 | |
Water | Control | -.02820 | .30146 | .926 | -.6518 | .5954 |
NE | 1.27661* | .31377 | .000 | .6275 | 1.9257 | |
Extract | .42881 | .30146 | .168 | -.1948 | 1.0524 |